Journal or Publishing Institution: Environmental Sciences Europe
Study: https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2190-4715-23-7
Author(s): Meyer, H.
Article Type: Journal Publication
Record ID: 1615
Abstract:
Purpose
Since more than 25 years, public dialogues, expert consultations and scientific publications have concluded that a comprehensive assessment of the implications of genetic engineering in agriculture and food production needs to include health, environmental, social and economical aspects, but only very few legal frameworks allow to assess the two latter aspects. This article aims to explain the divergence between societal debate and biosafety legislation and presents approaches to bring both together.
Main features
The article reviews the development of biosafety regulations in the USA and the EU, focussing on diverging concepts applied for assessing the risks of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).
Results
The dominant environmental risk assessment methodology has been developed to answer basic questions to enable expedient decision making. As a first step, methodologies that take into account complex environmental and landscape aspects should be applied. Expanding the scope of risk assessment, more holistic concepts have been developed, for example the Organisation for Econonomic Co-operation and Development (OECD) concept of systemic risks which includes socio-economic aspects. International bodies as the OECD, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the European Union (EU) have developed the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) as an instrument that includes the additional aspects of risk assessment as demanded by many stakeholders. Interestingly, there had been no attempts yet to link the existing frameworks of GMO risk assessment and SEA.
Conclusions
It is recommended to adapt current models of SEA to assess the systemic risks of GMOs. It is also suggested to revise the EU GMO legislation to promote the inclusion of SEA elements.
Keywords: European Union, Genetically Modify, Systemic Risk, Genetically Modify Crop, Genetically Modified Organisms; Biosafety, Decision Making, Environmental Assessment, Food Production, Genetic Engineering, International Organizations, Landscapes, Laws and Regulations, Models, Risk, Risk Assessment Process, Socioeconomics, Stakeholders, Transgenic Plants, United States
Citation: Meyer, H., 2011. Systemic risks of genetically modified crops: the need for new approaches to risk assessment. Environmental Sciences Europe, 23(1), p.7.
